Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Amelia Bissett vs Lara Pfeifer Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Bissett vs Pfeifer analysis and find out who is favored!
Amelia Bissett vs Lara Pfeifer Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Bissett 1 - 0 Pfeifer
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Bissett has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Pfeifer has won 45.36%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Bissett, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Pfeifer has won 56.58%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 42.28% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Bissett has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Pfeifer has saved 49.81% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Bissett has won 64.29% of matches played (W/L 9/ 5), with Pfeifer winning 55.56% (W/L 40/ 32) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Bissett has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 67% (W/L 2/ 1), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 23/ 18). Pfeifer has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 69/ 57), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 4).
- Player level: In the last year, Bissett has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 75% of matches (W/L 9/ 3), where as Pfeifer has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 58.18% of matches (W/L 32/ 23). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Bissett winning 1 times and Pfeifer being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Bissett winning 2 and Pfeifer winning 1. The last match between Bissett and Pfeifer was at the W15 Monastir, 06-07-2023, Second, Hard with Amelia Bissett getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-0.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:22:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Bissett and Pfeifer have played a deciding set 1 times, with Bissett winning 1 times and Pfeifer 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Bissett winning 0, and Pfeifer 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Bissett has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Pfeifer has played against players with an average rank of 153.85.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Bissett has won 100% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Pfeifer has won 50% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Bissett has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Pfeifer has converted 54.07% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
N/A
Rank
High
21
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
682
Rank
682
High
19
Age
Plays
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
L
L
Form
W
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
W
L
57% (25-19)
Career Total W/L
51% (92-88)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
56% (19-15)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Amelia Bissett vs Lara Pfeifer For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Bissett VS Pfeifer
Sportsbook
Offer
| stats | Amelia Bissett | Lara Pfeifer |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 7 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:22:0 | 2:22:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (57/87) | 83% (87/105) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (35/57) | 51% (44/87) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 28% (5/18) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 27% (8/30) | 45% (5/11) |
| Return Points W% | 53% (56/105) | 46% (40/87) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-0 |
Stats 
Amelia Bissett
Player
Lara Pfeifer
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
83%
(
87 of
105)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Amelia Bissett | Lara Pfeifer |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 56% (19/15) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (41/36) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 53% (369/331) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 59% (19/13) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/2) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.06 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 20 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.33 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 112 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:34:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 125.97 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 68% (1356/1993) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 57% (778/1356) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (287/637) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 56% (139/249) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (973/2060) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/5) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 55% (12/10) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 55% (17/31) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 20% (1/5) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 58% (7/12) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 89% (19/17) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 11% (19/2) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 13% (15/2) |
Amelia Bissett Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Saki Imamura
Player
Amelia Bissett
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve %
59%
(
34 of
58)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
55%
(
6 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
28 of
58)
62
Total Points Won
44
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Anastasia Iamachkine
Player
Amelia Bissett
77%
(
54 of
70)
1st Serve %
61%
(
33 of
54)
1
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
61%
(
33 of
54)
1st Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
44%
(
7 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
20%
(
2 of
10)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Camilla Zanolini
Player
Amelia Bissett
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
48 of
68)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
23 of
48)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
71
Total Points Won
55
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Lucia Llinares Domingo
74%
(
86 of
117)
1st Serve %
74%
(
76 of
103)
0
Aces
1
7
Double Faults
10
55%
(
47 of
86)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
38 of
76)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
47%
(
9 of
19)
Break Points Won
50%
(
6 of
12)
49%
(
57 of
117)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
58 of
103)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
6-7(3) 6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Lara Pfeifer
66%
(
57 of
87)
1st Serve %
83%
(
87 of
105)
1
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
7
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
44 of
87)
40%
(
12 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
27%
(
8 of
30)
Break Points Won
45%
(
5 of
11)
46%
(
40 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
105)
103
Total Points Won
89
|
6-3 4-6 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Charlotte Russell
67%
(
41 of
61)
1st Serve %
57%
(
40 of
70)
2
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
5
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
35%
(
7 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
47%
(
7 of
15)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
26 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
41 of
70)
76
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lya Fernandez
Player
Amelia Bissett
79%
(
59 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
39 of
65)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
7
58%
(
34 of
59)
1st Serve Won
44%
(
17 of
39)
38%
(
6 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
47%
(
35 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
35 of
65)
75
Total Points Won
65
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Amelia Bissett
Player
Diana De Simone
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
63%
(
38 of
60)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
20 of
29)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
17 of
38)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
13 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
36 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-7(3) 6-3 10-6 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-3 6-0 | H2H | |||
view more
Lara Pfeifer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Fangran Tian
Player
Lara Pfeifer
49%
(
24 of
49)
1st Serve %
66%
(
29 of
44)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
7
79%
(
19 of
24)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
13%
(
2 of
15)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Carla Tomai
53%
(
18 of
34)
1st Serve %
44%
(
19 of
43)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
89%
(
16 of
18)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
6 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
54
Total Points Won
23
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ankita Raina
Player
Lara Pfeifer
78%
(
47 of
60)
1st Serve %
65%
(
34 of
52)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
4
64%
(
30 of
47)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
8 of
18)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
35%
(
21 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
27 of
52)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Priska Madelyn Nugroho
Player
Lara Pfeifer
68%
(
43 of
63)
1st Serve %
56%
(
30 of
54)
0
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
19 of
30)
55%
(
11 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
6 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
23 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-0 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Alyssa Reguer
71%
(
62 of
87)
1st Serve %
69%
(
72 of
105)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
5
58%
(
36 of
62)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
39 of
72)
40%
(
10 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
56%
(
9 of
16)
Break Points Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
47%
(
41 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
56 of
105)
102
Total Points Won
90
|
7-5 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ekaterina Khayrutdinova
Player
Lara Pfeifer
80%
(
71 of
89)
1st Serve %
69%
(
58 of
84)
0
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
56%
(
40 of
71)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
33%
(
6 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
48%
(
43 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
40 of
84)
86
Total Points Won
87
|
0-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Amandine Hesse
Player
Lara Pfeifer
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve %
70%
(
14 of
20)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
67%
(
6 of
9)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
86%
(
6 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
67%
(
4 of
6)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
25%
(
4 of
16)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
12 of
20)
24
Total Points Won
12
|
5-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Lucia Cortez Llorca
67%
(
60 of
89)
1st Serve %
44%
(
35 of
80)
0
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
7
65%
(
39 of
60)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
52%
(
15 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
17 of
45)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
56%
(
5 of
9)
39%
(
35 of
89)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
43 of
80)
97
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 5-7 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Mana Kawamura
78%
(
62 of
79)
1st Serve %
73%
(
70 of
96)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
3
53%
(
33 of
62)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
39 of
70)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
8 of
26)
58%
(
7 of
12)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
43%
(
34 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
49 of
96)
94
Total Points Won
81
|
3-6 6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lara Pfeifer
Player
Tessah Andrianjafitrimo
74%
(
55 of
74)
1st Serve %
58%
(
38 of
66)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
7
49%
(
27 of
55)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
5 of
10)
49%
(
36 of
74)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
29 of
66)
67
Total Points Won
73
|
6-4 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Bissett Vs Pfeifer Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Bissett are available here and Pfeifer photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
